Review



custom fitted glass suction electrode  (Digitimer North America LLC)


Bioz Verified Symbol Digitimer North America LLC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Digitimer North America LLC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Digitimer North America LLC custom fitted glass suction electrode
    Custom Fitted Glass Suction Electrode, supplied by Digitimer North America LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 3293 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/custom fitted glass suction electrode/product/Digitimer North America LLC
    Average 96 stars, based on 3293 article reviews
    custom fitted glass suction electrode - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    98
    Sutter Instrument Company stimulating borosilicate glass electrode
    Stimulating Borosilicate Glass Electrode, supplied by Sutter Instrument Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/stimulating borosilicate glass electrode/product/Sutter Instrument Company
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    stimulating borosilicate glass electrode - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Digitimer North America LLC custom fitted glass suction electrode
    Custom Fitted Glass Suction Electrode, supplied by Digitimer North America LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/custom fitted glass suction electrode/product/Digitimer North America LLC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    custom fitted glass suction electrode - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Microelectrodes Inc stimulating electrode
    Stimulating Electrode, supplied by Microelectrodes Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/stimulating electrode/product/Microelectrodes Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    stimulating electrode - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    A-M Systems stainless steel stimulating electrode
    Stainless Steel Stimulating Electrode, supplied by A-M Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/stainless steel stimulating electrode/product/A-M Systems
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    stainless steel stimulating electrode - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Digitimer North America LLC stimulating electrode
    Stimulating Electrode, supplied by Digitimer North America LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/stimulating electrode/product/Digitimer North America LLC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    stimulating electrode - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    ADInstruments bar electrode
    Bar Electrode, supplied by ADInstruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/bar electrode/product/ADInstruments
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bar electrode - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    A-M Systems stimulating electrode
    Stimulating Electrode, supplied by A-M Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/stimulating electrode/product/A-M Systems
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    stimulating electrode - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Aurora Scientific platinum field stimulation electrode
    (A) Generation of Micu2 −/− (KO) mice. The Cre transgene under the EIIa promoter was used to target exon 3 of the floxed Micu2 (WT) gene for removal on the C57BL/6J background, as described previously. (B) Micu2 −/− mice showing Mendelian distribution. (C) Abundance of different mtCU subunits (MICU1, MICU2, MICU3, MCU, and EMRE) quantified by western blot in lysates from DIV11–15 WT and KO cortical neurons under reducing conditions normalized to the mitochondrial mass loading control, TOMM20, and WT. Significant differences ( p < 0.05) between conditions are highlighted in bold. Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using Student’s t test or Welch’s t test if criteria for equal variances are not met; n = 8 (embryos) for each group. (D) Immunodetection of MICU dimers and loading control, TOMM20, by western blot in lysates from WT and KO cortical tissue under non-reducing conditions. Representative membranes are shown. (E) [Ca 2+ ] c signals measured by Cal520 and induced by electrical field <t>stimulation</t> indicated on the graph in intact DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons with Cal520 and infected with mtRCaMP; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (F) [Ca 2+ ] m signals measured simultaneously with (E) as mtRCaMP fluorescence intensity and normalized to the baseline; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (G) [Ca 2+ ] m signals measured simultaneously with (E) as mtRCaMP fluorescence lifetime; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (H) Resting [Ca 2+ ] m in DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons transfected with mtGEM-GECO1. Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using Mann-Whitney test; n (WT) = 10 and n (KO) = 13 (embryos). (I) Resting [Ca 2+ ] m in DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons infected with mtRCaMP and measured as fluorescence lifetime. Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using Student’s t test; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (J) Quantification of the peak for (D). (K) Quantification of the peak for (E). (L) Quantification of the peak for (F). (M) [Ca 2+ ] c signals measured by fura-2 and induced by electrical field stimulation indicated on the graph in intact DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons with fura-2 and transfected with 4mtGCaMP6f; n = 5 (time pregnancies for each group). (N) Quantification of AUC for the first stimulation in (M). (O) Quantification of total AUC in (M). (P) [Ca 2+ ] m signals measured simultaneously with (M) as 4mtGCaMP6f fluorescence intensity; n = 5 (time pregnancies for each group). (Q) Quantification of AUC for the first stimulation in (P). (R) Quantification of total AUC in (P). Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using one-tail Welch’s t test in (J)–(L), (N), (O), (Q), and (R). p values are indicated in the graphs. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. See also and .
    Platinum Field Stimulation Electrode, supplied by Aurora Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/platinum field stimulation electrode/product/Aurora Scientific
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    platinum field stimulation electrode - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    St Jude Medical stimulation electrodes
    (A) Generation of Micu2 −/− (KO) mice. The Cre transgene under the EIIa promoter was used to target exon 3 of the floxed Micu2 (WT) gene for removal on the C57BL/6J background, as described previously. (B) Micu2 −/− mice showing Mendelian distribution. (C) Abundance of different mtCU subunits (MICU1, MICU2, MICU3, MCU, and EMRE) quantified by western blot in lysates from DIV11–15 WT and KO cortical neurons under reducing conditions normalized to the mitochondrial mass loading control, TOMM20, and WT. Significant differences ( p < 0.05) between conditions are highlighted in bold. Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using Student’s t test or Welch’s t test if criteria for equal variances are not met; n = 8 (embryos) for each group. (D) Immunodetection of MICU dimers and loading control, TOMM20, by western blot in lysates from WT and KO cortical tissue under non-reducing conditions. Representative membranes are shown. (E) [Ca 2+ ] c signals measured by Cal520 and induced by electrical field <t>stimulation</t> indicated on the graph in intact DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons with Cal520 and infected with mtRCaMP; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (F) [Ca 2+ ] m signals measured simultaneously with (E) as mtRCaMP fluorescence intensity and normalized to the baseline; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (G) [Ca 2+ ] m signals measured simultaneously with (E) as mtRCaMP fluorescence lifetime; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (H) Resting [Ca 2+ ] m in DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons transfected with mtGEM-GECO1. Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using Mann-Whitney test; n (WT) = 10 and n (KO) = 13 (embryos). (I) Resting [Ca 2+ ] m in DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons infected with mtRCaMP and measured as fluorescence lifetime. Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using Student’s t test; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (J) Quantification of the peak for (D). (K) Quantification of the peak for (E). (L) Quantification of the peak for (F). (M) [Ca 2+ ] c signals measured by fura-2 and induced by electrical field stimulation indicated on the graph in intact DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons with fura-2 and transfected with 4mtGCaMP6f; n = 5 (time pregnancies for each group). (N) Quantification of AUC for the first stimulation in (M). (O) Quantification of total AUC in (M). (P) [Ca 2+ ] m signals measured simultaneously with (M) as 4mtGCaMP6f fluorescence intensity; n = 5 (time pregnancies for each group). (Q) Quantification of AUC for the first stimulation in (P). (R) Quantification of total AUC in (P). Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using one-tail Welch’s t test in (J)–(L), (N), (O), (Q), and (R). p values are indicated in the graphs. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. See also and .
    Stimulation Electrodes, supplied by St Jude Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/stimulation electrodes/product/St Jude Medical
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    stimulation electrodes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Generation of Micu2 −/− (KO) mice. The Cre transgene under the EIIa promoter was used to target exon 3 of the floxed Micu2 (WT) gene for removal on the C57BL/6J background, as described previously. (B) Micu2 −/− mice showing Mendelian distribution. (C) Abundance of different mtCU subunits (MICU1, MICU2, MICU3, MCU, and EMRE) quantified by western blot in lysates from DIV11–15 WT and KO cortical neurons under reducing conditions normalized to the mitochondrial mass loading control, TOMM20, and WT. Significant differences ( p < 0.05) between conditions are highlighted in bold. Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using Student’s t test or Welch’s t test if criteria for equal variances are not met; n = 8 (embryos) for each group. (D) Immunodetection of MICU dimers and loading control, TOMM20, by western blot in lysates from WT and KO cortical tissue under non-reducing conditions. Representative membranes are shown. (E) [Ca 2+ ] c signals measured by Cal520 and induced by electrical field stimulation indicated on the graph in intact DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons with Cal520 and infected with mtRCaMP; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (F) [Ca 2+ ] m signals measured simultaneously with (E) as mtRCaMP fluorescence intensity and normalized to the baseline; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (G) [Ca 2+ ] m signals measured simultaneously with (E) as mtRCaMP fluorescence lifetime; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (H) Resting [Ca 2+ ] m in DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons transfected with mtGEM-GECO1. Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using Mann-Whitney test; n (WT) = 10 and n (KO) = 13 (embryos). (I) Resting [Ca 2+ ] m in DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons infected with mtRCaMP and measured as fluorescence lifetime. Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using Student’s t test; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (J) Quantification of the peak for (D). (K) Quantification of the peak for (E). (L) Quantification of the peak for (F). (M) [Ca 2+ ] c signals measured by fura-2 and induced by electrical field stimulation indicated on the graph in intact DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons with fura-2 and transfected with 4mtGCaMP6f; n = 5 (time pregnancies for each group). (N) Quantification of AUC for the first stimulation in (M). (O) Quantification of total AUC in (M). (P) [Ca 2+ ] m signals measured simultaneously with (M) as 4mtGCaMP6f fluorescence intensity; n = 5 (time pregnancies for each group). (Q) Quantification of AUC for the first stimulation in (P). (R) Quantification of total AUC in (P). Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using one-tail Welch’s t test in (J)–(L), (N), (O), (Q), and (R). p values are indicated in the graphs. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. See also and .

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: MICU2 controls mitochondrial calcium signaling and migration in neurons during development

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116583

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Generation of Micu2 −/− (KO) mice. The Cre transgene under the EIIa promoter was used to target exon 3 of the floxed Micu2 (WT) gene for removal on the C57BL/6J background, as described previously. (B) Micu2 −/− mice showing Mendelian distribution. (C) Abundance of different mtCU subunits (MICU1, MICU2, MICU3, MCU, and EMRE) quantified by western blot in lysates from DIV11–15 WT and KO cortical neurons under reducing conditions normalized to the mitochondrial mass loading control, TOMM20, and WT. Significant differences ( p < 0.05) between conditions are highlighted in bold. Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using Student’s t test or Welch’s t test if criteria for equal variances are not met; n = 8 (embryos) for each group. (D) Immunodetection of MICU dimers and loading control, TOMM20, by western blot in lysates from WT and KO cortical tissue under non-reducing conditions. Representative membranes are shown. (E) [Ca 2+ ] c signals measured by Cal520 and induced by electrical field stimulation indicated on the graph in intact DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons with Cal520 and infected with mtRCaMP; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (F) [Ca 2+ ] m signals measured simultaneously with (E) as mtRCaMP fluorescence intensity and normalized to the baseline; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (G) [Ca 2+ ] m signals measured simultaneously with (E) as mtRCaMP fluorescence lifetime; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (H) Resting [Ca 2+ ] m in DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons transfected with mtGEM-GECO1. Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using Mann-Whitney test; n (WT) = 10 and n (KO) = 13 (embryos). (I) Resting [Ca 2+ ] m in DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons infected with mtRCaMP and measured as fluorescence lifetime. Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using Student’s t test; n = 4 (time pregnancies for each group). (J) Quantification of the peak for (D). (K) Quantification of the peak for (E). (L) Quantification of the peak for (F). (M) [Ca 2+ ] c signals measured by fura-2 and induced by electrical field stimulation indicated on the graph in intact DIV11–15 WT and KO primary cortical neurons with fura-2 and transfected with 4mtGCaMP6f; n = 5 (time pregnancies for each group). (N) Quantification of AUC for the first stimulation in (M). (O) Quantification of total AUC in (M). (P) [Ca 2+ ] m signals measured simultaneously with (M) as 4mtGCaMP6f fluorescence intensity; n = 5 (time pregnancies for each group). (Q) Quantification of AUC for the first stimulation in (P). (R) Quantification of total AUC in (P). Statistical analysis between the groups was determined using one-tail Welch’s t test in (J)–(L), (N), (O), (Q), and (R). p values are indicated in the graphs. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. See also and .

    Article Snippet: The cells were subjected to electrical field stimulation at 20 and 40 V/cm achieved by passing 2-ms current pulses in a biphasic mode at different frequencies using a platinum field stimulation electrode (RC-49MFSH) and High-Power Bi-Phase Stimulator 701C (Aurora Scientific) under the control of Optogenetic TTL pulse generator with corresponding software (Doric lenses).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Control, Immunodetection, Infection, Fluorescence, Transfection, MANN-WHITNEY